The branches of agreement and disagreement in the opinion
The branches of agreement and disagreement in the opinion
(Question 1788): There is no difference in knowing a sharia ruling, whether one knows it or argues against it
If two people imitate one theologian, he says that boiling Arab juice is forbidden.
One of them is burned, the other is burned.
(Case 1789): If the question is different between the two persons by jurisprudence or tradition,
The person charged may have the opinion of the perpetrator contrary to his own, and what he did is permissible in his view.
(Case 1790): If the matter was a convention, and the perpetrator was probably ignorant of the judgment,
It is necessary to order and prohibit, especially if it is possible that he is ignorant of shortcomings, but this does not exclude the duty of education.
Guidance for the responsible.
(Question 1791): If the agent is ignorant of the subject, it must not be denied or relieved of ignorance, nor
If the man is ignorant of the subject as if he saw a man accept a woman and she is likely to be his wife.
(Case 1792): If they consider that their conduct is contrary to mandatory caution,
Traditionally, caution is denied.
(Question 1793): If a source who is certainly not entitled to do so enjoins what is right or forbids what is wrong,
He must be forbidden by others, whether or not there is a permissible or obligatory law against him.
(Question 1794): If two persons know in aggregate that the denial of one is effective only in relation to the other, each of them must
If one of them is denied, the other is denied, or the other is obliged.
(Question 1795): If he knowingly, certainly or in a reasonable manner appears to have intended to commit
It is a faulty, unreliable source.
(Question 1796): If the ordering person knows that the perpetrator is unable to do what is forbidden or to repeat it, he must not be forbidden
In the case of an incapable act, if the perpetrator was not convinced of his incapacity and was determined to
He is not allowed to do anything, even if he is in a position to do so.
(Question 1797): If he knows in general that one or more persons are the perpetrators of the forbidden act and continue to do so,
Neither should be forbidden in general nor in detail, even if it is cautious.
(Question 1798): If the person charged with the duty knew that the other had committed a wrong or omitted a duty, but did not know it specifically,
The order and the prohibition must be given in the form of a thumbs up, and if it is known that the mother is destitute.
A duty or a sin.
(Question 1799): If the perpetrator of the haram or the omission believed that it was permissible to do or omit,
This is a case of objective suspicion, such as the claim that fasting is harmful, or that the disease is exclusively cured.
He is not to be ignored, and he is not to be ignored, and he is not to be ignored.
He is not allowed to wake a sleeping person for prayer or to tell him that the place is unclean.
He is not wrong in revealing or concealing, nor if he is ignorant of the judgement, as if he were imitating someone.
If he sees that, he must not be lifted from his ignorance and his judgment must not be made known to him.
The proof of ignorance.
(Question 1788): There is no difference in knowing a sharia ruling, whether one knows it or argues against it
If two people imitate one theologian, he says that boiling Arab juice is forbidden.
One of them is burned, the other is burned.
(Case 1789): If the question is different between the two persons by jurisprudence or tradition,
The person charged may have the opinion of the perpetrator contrary to his own, and what he did is permissible in his view.
(Case 1790): If the matter was a convention, and the perpetrator was probably ignorant of the judgment,
It is necessary to order and prohibit, especially if it is possible that he is ignorant of shortcomings, but this does not exclude the duty of education.
Guidance for the responsible.
(Question 1791): If the agent is ignorant of the subject, it must not be denied or relieved of ignorance, nor
If the man is ignorant of the subject as if he saw a man accept a woman and she is likely to be his wife.
(Case 1792): If they consider that their conduct is contrary to mandatory caution,
Traditionally, caution is denied.
(Question 1793): If a source who is certainly not entitled to do so enjoins what is right or forbids what is wrong,
He must be forbidden by others, whether or not there is a permissible or obligatory law against him.
(Question 1794): If two persons know in aggregate that the denial of one is effective only in relation to the other, each of them must
If one of them is denied, the other is denied, or the other is obliged.
(Question 1795): If he knowingly, certainly or in a reasonable manner appears to have intended to commit
It is a faulty, unreliable source.
(Question 1796): If the ordering person knows that the perpetrator is unable to do what is forbidden or to repeat it, he must not be forbidden
In the case of an incapable act, if the perpetrator was not convinced of his incapacity and was determined to
He is not allowed to do anything, even if he is in a position to do so.
(Question 1797): If he knows in general that one or more persons are the perpetrators of the forbidden act and continue to do so,
Neither should be forbidden in general nor in detail, even if it is cautious.
(Question 1798): If the person charged with the duty knew that the other had committed a wrong or omitted a duty, but did not know it specifically,
The order and the prohibition must be given in the form of a thumbs up, and if it is known that the mother is destitute.
A duty or a sin.
(Question 1799): If the perpetrator of the haram or the omission believed that it was permissible to do or omit,
This is a case of objective suspicion, such as the claim that fasting is harmful, or that the disease is exclusively cured.
He is not to be ignored, and he is not to be ignored, and he is not to be ignored.
He is not allowed to wake a sleeping person for prayer or to tell him that the place is unclean.
He is not wrong in revealing or concealing, nor if he is ignorant of the judgement, as if he were imitating someone.
If he sees that, he must not be lifted from his ignorance and his judgment must not be made known to him.
The proof of ignorance.
All rights reserved