In the case of the fault.
Chapter 5: The Finality
It has chapters:
Chapter 1
In the case of the fault.
They are based on two main justifications: the lack of water and the inability to access water.
The use of it for the existence of a mental or legal impediment on the part of the charged person, with the presence of water, combined with the title of excuse
The prediction of water purification.
First ground: lack of sufficient water for ablution or wash or water suitable for use in ablution or wash;
It is achieved in one of the following cases:
The first case: the charged cannot find water in his home or anywhere else he can reach.
He is a resident of the same town as the other two, but he is not a resident of the town.
The limits of the area of the earth that it can reach without obstacle and move within it.
The time of prayer remained, no matter whether there was no water or there was.
Not enough for ablution or wash, or enough but there is a prohibition against using it as if it were
If it is unclean or impure, its function is to complete the ritual instead of ablution or washing.
(Issue
398): That area of land where the commissioner must ask for water is not
Limits are not strictly set in length or width.
The arrow is thrown in the ground and the two arrows are thrown into the air.
The plain land is, if it is proved by way of example, on the limits of the possibility of innocent search for the deed, and it is
Varies with time, conditions and people. There may be no water in the neighbourhood but there is a water supply.
Can move by car without difficulty or difficulty to another residential neighbourhood where water is available,
If the other party cannot do the same thing, then the criterion for the request must be within that.
The space is spacious and narrow because it does not require hardship, embarrassment, harm or physical danger.
(Issue
399): If he witnesses confidently, he is assured of his statement that there is no water in that area of the
The land, it is sufficient that it is not required to be examined and requested.
(Issue
400): The deputy may be appointed in the application if he is trusted and is assured of what he says.
Case 2: Water is present at some points in the area but access is required
It is very difficult and embarrassing as if the water is in a distant point, or it belongs to someone who does not.
It is not allowed to be handled except by humiliating and humiliating him in an embarrassing way, or that access to it
It is dangerous as if the path to it is unsafe or it is near animals.
In this case, its function is to complete all these assumptions instead of washing or washing.
Wash.
Third case: water is present in the area but belongs to someone else and is not authorized
dispose of it except for an unfairly high price, or Access to it depends on committing harmful acts.
As if the way to him was clogged, or the machine he used to take that water was clogged,
In this case, its function is the complement.
We note that the charge in the first case, since it is not water, cannot be verified.
The second and third cases are the following:
The person who is charged can wash and is allowed to leave it and return to the timah, but if he insists on washing.
He got the water by bearing all the difficulties of harm and damage and he must wash and be healthy from it.
(Issue
401): If he fails to do the prayer and the timah is pleased to realize the reality, the timah is valid if there is no water.
(Issue
402): Based on the determination of the area of inspection, if known or assured of the presence of water outside
The limit mentioned must be sought, even if far away, unless the pursuit is forestry or in
Great difficulty.
(Issue
If he asked for water before time came, and did not find it, then time came, he must not return it.
The demand, unless there is a renewed possibility of water.
(Issue
If the prayer is asked after the time for the other prayers has expired, the request must not be repeated.
At every prayer, if it is possible to find with the return the possibility of his renewal, he must return.
Research.
(Issue
405): The duty to ask falls away in the shortness of time, as it falls away if he fears for himself or his property from a thief or
Seven or so, and also if his request is difficult and difficult to bear as it has been.
(Issue
406): If the person in charge leaves the water request in the areas mentioned until time runs out, he deserves punishment.
He is a good man, but he is a fool, and he is a fool, but he is a fool.
The second is the second-order case.
(Issue
407): If he intentionally leaves the request in time and prays, his prayer is nullified if there is no water,
Yes, if he had the intention of approaching and it was clear that there was no water when he prayed, he would be considered to have prayed.
He is either unconscious or conscious of his actions.
(Issue
If he thinks he has no time to pray, he leaves it and completes the prayer, and then shows the capacity of the time if he has it.
If he sought and found water, it would reveal the nullity of his marriage.
His prayers and the need for restitution, though out of time, must not be eliminated.
(Issue
If he is not able to find water, he must pray and then find it in the place where he asked for it.
Return in time, yes, must not be eliminated if it is found out in time.
Second ground: the person in charge is unable to use the water while it is with him.
One of the following:
Case 1: Fear of harm from the use of water by the occurrence, increase or prolongation of a disease, or
And there is the foul smell of water, and there is the fear of the devil.
The unbearable, the roughness that distorts creation, and in some worlds leads to
Skin cracks.
Case two: Fear of thirst for himself, or for another who is obliged to keep it for him, or for himself.
The animal is expected to be kept, cared for, fed, and so on.
It is a cause of pain or injury.
Third: If his body or clothing is unclean and he has sufficient water to remove the impurity.
In this case, the person may use the water for his own washing or for his own washing.
He is covered with clothing and prays.
Fourth case: If he has no time to perform both the wajah and the prayer, he may
It is completed to realize the completeness of prayer in time.
Case 5: The person is charged with another important duty in which water must be discharged in a manner
Nothing but water can replace it, as it removes impurity from the mosque.
(Issue
If the person who is charged intentionally contravenes the law, he must wash in a source where washing is as obligatory as washing.
If the light is too bright, the light is not visible, and if it is too dark, the light is visible.
The fault is serious, and the fault is such that the commissioner is forbidden to sign.
If it is in a source where water must be kept, as in the second case, the evidence is sufficient.
In the fourth case, if he does not and washes, it is valid provided that he does not intend to wash.
The preface to this prayer, which is short of time because it does not require ablution with the shortage of time, so if
The universe's absolute notion of purity or the psychological acceptance of the light is true because these intentions are not.
Time-bound.
(Issue
If he does not, he must wash with water for the sake of forgetfulness or neglect.
The above-mentioned resources, as well as ignorance if it is compound, unless washing is forbidden in it.
Reality.
(Issue
If he is not in bed, he may do so.
If you can use water, please bring it, and if you can use the water, please bring it.
To pray the funeral if he fears not to be aware.
It has chapters:
Chapter 1
In the case of the fault.
They are based on two main justifications: the lack of water and the inability to access water.
The use of it for the existence of a mental or legal impediment on the part of the charged person, with the presence of water, combined with the title of excuse
The prediction of water purification.
First ground: lack of sufficient water for ablution or wash or water suitable for use in ablution or wash;
It is achieved in one of the following cases:
The first case: the charged cannot find water in his home or anywhere else he can reach.
He is a resident of the same town as the other two, but he is not a resident of the town.
The limits of the area of the earth that it can reach without obstacle and move within it.
The time of prayer remained, no matter whether there was no water or there was.
Not enough for ablution or wash, or enough but there is a prohibition against using it as if it were
If it is unclean or impure, its function is to complete the ritual instead of ablution or washing.
(Issue
398): That area of land where the commissioner must ask for water is not
Limits are not strictly set in length or width.
The arrow is thrown in the ground and the two arrows are thrown into the air.
The plain land is, if it is proved by way of example, on the limits of the possibility of innocent search for the deed, and it is
Varies with time, conditions and people. There may be no water in the neighbourhood but there is a water supply.
Can move by car without difficulty or difficulty to another residential neighbourhood where water is available,
If the other party cannot do the same thing, then the criterion for the request must be within that.
The space is spacious and narrow because it does not require hardship, embarrassment, harm or physical danger.
(Issue
399): If he witnesses confidently, he is assured of his statement that there is no water in that area of the
The land, it is sufficient that it is not required to be examined and requested.
(Issue
400): The deputy may be appointed in the application if he is trusted and is assured of what he says.
Case 2: Water is present at some points in the area but access is required
It is very difficult and embarrassing as if the water is in a distant point, or it belongs to someone who does not.
It is not allowed to be handled except by humiliating and humiliating him in an embarrassing way, or that access to it
It is dangerous as if the path to it is unsafe or it is near animals.
In this case, its function is to complete all these assumptions instead of washing or washing.
Wash.
Third case: water is present in the area but belongs to someone else and is not authorized
dispose of it except for an unfairly high price, or Access to it depends on committing harmful acts.
As if the way to him was clogged, or the machine he used to take that water was clogged,
In this case, its function is the complement.
We note that the charge in the first case, since it is not water, cannot be verified.
The second and third cases are the following:
The person who is charged can wash and is allowed to leave it and return to the timah, but if he insists on washing.
He got the water by bearing all the difficulties of harm and damage and he must wash and be healthy from it.
(Issue
401): If he fails to do the prayer and the timah is pleased to realize the reality, the timah is valid if there is no water.
(Issue
402): Based on the determination of the area of inspection, if known or assured of the presence of water outside
The limit mentioned must be sought, even if far away, unless the pursuit is forestry or in
Great difficulty.
(Issue
If he asked for water before time came, and did not find it, then time came, he must not return it.
The demand, unless there is a renewed possibility of water.
(Issue
If the prayer is asked after the time for the other prayers has expired, the request must not be repeated.
At every prayer, if it is possible to find with the return the possibility of his renewal, he must return.
Research.
(Issue
405): The duty to ask falls away in the shortness of time, as it falls away if he fears for himself or his property from a thief or
Seven or so, and also if his request is difficult and difficult to bear as it has been.
(Issue
406): If the person in charge leaves the water request in the areas mentioned until time runs out, he deserves punishment.
He is a good man, but he is a fool, and he is a fool, but he is a fool.
The second is the second-order case.
(Issue
407): If he intentionally leaves the request in time and prays, his prayer is nullified if there is no water,
Yes, if he had the intention of approaching and it was clear that there was no water when he prayed, he would be considered to have prayed.
He is either unconscious or conscious of his actions.
(Issue
If he thinks he has no time to pray, he leaves it and completes the prayer, and then shows the capacity of the time if he has it.
If he sought and found water, it would reveal the nullity of his marriage.
His prayers and the need for restitution, though out of time, must not be eliminated.
(Issue
If he is not able to find water, he must pray and then find it in the place where he asked for it.
Return in time, yes, must not be eliminated if it is found out in time.
Second ground: the person in charge is unable to use the water while it is with him.
One of the following:
Case 1: Fear of harm from the use of water by the occurrence, increase or prolongation of a disease, or
And there is the foul smell of water, and there is the fear of the devil.
The unbearable, the roughness that distorts creation, and in some worlds leads to
Skin cracks.
Case two: Fear of thirst for himself, or for another who is obliged to keep it for him, or for himself.
The animal is expected to be kept, cared for, fed, and so on.
It is a cause of pain or injury.
Third: If his body or clothing is unclean and he has sufficient water to remove the impurity.
In this case, the person may use the water for his own washing or for his own washing.
He is covered with clothing and prays.
Fourth case: If he has no time to perform both the wajah and the prayer, he may
It is completed to realize the completeness of prayer in time.
Case 5: The person is charged with another important duty in which water must be discharged in a manner
Nothing but water can replace it, as it removes impurity from the mosque.
(Issue
If the person who is charged intentionally contravenes the law, he must wash in a source where washing is as obligatory as washing.
If the light is too bright, the light is not visible, and if it is too dark, the light is visible.
The fault is serious, and the fault is such that the commissioner is forbidden to sign.
If it is in a source where water must be kept, as in the second case, the evidence is sufficient.
In the fourth case, if he does not and washes, it is valid provided that he does not intend to wash.
The preface to this prayer, which is short of time because it does not require ablution with the shortage of time, so if
The universe's absolute notion of purity or the psychological acceptance of the light is true because these intentions are not.
Time-bound.
(Issue
If he does not, he must wash with water for the sake of forgetfulness or neglect.
The above-mentioned resources, as well as ignorance if it is compound, unless washing is forbidden in it.
Reality.
(Issue
If he is not in bed, he may do so.
If you can use water, please bring it, and if you can use the water, please bring it.
To pray the funeral if he fears not to be aware.
All rights reserved