The Water Rule
Chapter 4: The Rule of Suspicious Water
If one of the two is unclean and the other is clean, it is not permissible to lift the shaft with one of them.
The event is lifted, but the impurity of one's clothing is not judged even if the impurity of the other is suspected.
If the person suspects the addition, he may wash the waste with one of them and then wash the other, and so on.
If the person suspects that the person is a liar, it is forbidden to handle both, but if he is washed, he is a liar.
One of them is pure, and none raises the event.
This is all if the suspicion is confined, or if the suspicion's ends are not confined, then it is possible.
Use absolutely.
The criterion for unlimited suspicion is that the case is such that the probability of proof is low.
1. To entrust the commissioner to one party so that the person is confident and assured of the absence of any,
For example, a Muslim does not stop buying meat from a Muslim butcher's market simply because he knows of its existence.
Unregulated by the lawful limits of indulgence, he does not stop buying cheese from the market just because
He knows that some of his makers are not afraid of the dead, because the possibility that what he gets in his hands is the dead is high.
The ability to be alone is a weakness that does not allow him to be in the middle of anything.
Their lives.
(Question 59): The above provision does not differ for parties to a limited doubt if
One of the two is a water-in-the-mouth, which takes him out of the circle of trial and dealing with the other, because
The total knowledge, if dissolved and turned into a suspicion, is not a source of originality.
The water is pure because it is preceded by a total knowledge, and this water cannot be used to raise the event.
Scrap.
If one of the two is unclean and the other is clean, it is not permissible to lift the shaft with one of them.
The event is lifted, but the impurity of one's clothing is not judged even if the impurity of the other is suspected.
If the person suspects the addition, he may wash the waste with one of them and then wash the other, and so on.
If the person suspects that the person is a liar, it is forbidden to handle both, but if he is washed, he is a liar.
One of them is pure, and none raises the event.
This is all if the suspicion is confined, or if the suspicion's ends are not confined, then it is possible.
Use absolutely.
The criterion for unlimited suspicion is that the case is such that the probability of proof is low.
1. To entrust the commissioner to one party so that the person is confident and assured of the absence of any,
For example, a Muslim does not stop buying meat from a Muslim butcher's market simply because he knows of its existence.
Unregulated by the lawful limits of indulgence, he does not stop buying cheese from the market just because
He knows that some of his makers are not afraid of the dead, because the possibility that what he gets in his hands is the dead is high.
The ability to be alone is a weakness that does not allow him to be in the middle of anything.
Their lives.
(Question 59): The above provision does not differ for parties to a limited doubt if
One of the two is a water-in-the-mouth, which takes him out of the circle of trial and dealing with the other, because
The total knowledge, if dissolved and turned into a suspicion, is not a source of originality.
The water is pure because it is preceded by a total knowledge, and this water cannot be used to raise the event.
Scrap.
All rights reserved